Current:Home > ScamsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Aspire Money Growth
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-15 09:12:10
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (3317)
Related
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Florida State can't afford to fire Mike Norvell -- and can't afford to keep him
- Businesses at struggling corner where George Floyd was killed sue Minneapolis
- Dogecoin soars after Trump's Elon Musk announcement: What to know about the cryptocurrency
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Video ‘bares’ all: Insurers say bear that damaged luxury cars was actually a person in a costume
- Watch out, Temu: Amazon Haul, Amazon's new discount store, is coming for the holidays
- Eva Longoria Shares She and Her Family Have Moved Out of the United States
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Halle Berry surprises crowd in iconic 2002 Elie Saab gown from her historic Oscar win
Ranking
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- 'America's flagship' SS United States has departure from Philadelphia to Florida delayed
- Giuliani’s lawyers after $148M defamation judgment seek to withdraw from his case
- Atlanta man dies in shootout after police chase that also kills police dog
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- The state that cleared the way for sports gambling now may ban ‘prop’ bets on college athletes
- The Best Gifts for Men – That He Won’t Want to Return
- NFL Week 11 picks straight up and against spread: Will Bills hand Chiefs first loss of season?
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
More than 150 pronghorns hit, killed on Colorado roads as animals sought shelter from snow
Mechanic dies after being 'trapped' under Amazon delivery van at Florida-based center
Wisconsin agency issues first round of permits for Enbridge Line 5 reroute around reservation
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
Channing Tatum Drops Shirtless Selfie After Zoë Kravitz Breakup
4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit'
The Daily Money: All about 'Doge.'